Federalist Vs Republican Essay

Introduction:  AP US History Review – The Federalists vs. the Democratic-Republicans

Often times in human history, some of the most important events have been spoken words. In 1796 one such event occurred. The stage was set for one of America’s greatest leaders to give his lasting words on what he felt the young republic should entrench upon its foundation.

At his farewell address, George Washington, a colossal man in American history, warned the American people of the threats as he saw them. Here he warned against “the baneful effects of the Spirit of Party.” He cautioned the American people of designing men who sought to divide the nation to gain political power.

As you prepare for your AP US History exam this is what you need to know about the Federalists vs. the Democratic-Republicans.  Because George Washington said so!  Even today this is a hotly debated topic and seemingly still somewhat undecided. How much power should the federal government have? And what can and can’t the federal government do with its power? That is why today some people like strong government and then again some people don’t.

What Was America Like Early On?

Despite Washington’s prophetic farewell words, the path was already set for America’s two political party system. In fact, this political back story had been brewing for quite some time – since the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Bill of Rights. America as a new nation had many difficult decisions to make on how it was going to be as a country. There was no real precedence to follow. Many mistakes were made despite extreme caution issued by our founding fathers.

At that time, America’s founding fathers and the earliest American politicians were still divided on how much power the Constitution gave its leaders. Even before passing the U.S. Constitution, the founding fathers released the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers arguing on behalf of and against a strong national government. Based upon the ideas of the Enlightenment and borrowed from the philosophies of men like John Locke and the Baron de Montesquieu, these papers argued the constraints of power and a government not based upon monarchy but democracy.

The Two Teams – The Federalists vs. the Democratic-Republicans

In one corner were the Federalists. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, were made up primarily of merchants, bankers, and industrialists alongside many wealthy plantation owners in the North and in the South. Most were well-educated property owners. The bulk of the group lived in New England. The Federalists passionately believed a large, powerful government was needed in order to control the factions. Certainly, this stemmed from the past failures of the Articles of Confederation (the government before the U.S. Constitution) and its failures to not only tax the newly formed Thirteen Colonies nor raise an army but also to control the newly formed republic.

The Federalists also believed that the common American at that time was largely ignorant and incapable of making intelligent decisions when it came to running the country. Because most of the Federalists were very wealthy, they did not want the power of voting in the hands of the lesser classes and believed with great fervor that the elite should rule.

In the other corner were the Democratic-Republicans. The Democratic-Republicans were led predominantly by Thomas Jefferson. Democratic-Republicans were mostly craftsmen and artisans, settlers in the frontier (which at that time was just past the Appalachian Mountains in the Northwest Territory), and poor farmers. Most were not very well educated. Although Jefferson himself was a man of great genius, his allure to these people lay with the fact that he was a complicated man who believed very strongly in the strength of a nation run by common man under a form of self-government.

This basic disagreement had been going on in American politics for quite some time before the two political factions finally split. In fact, during Washington’s presidency, Hamilton served as Washington’s first Secretary of Treasurer and Jefferson served as Washington’s Secretary of State. Can you imagine how heated the arguments were between both Jefferson and Hamilton behind closed doors? It is a wonder Washington got anything done! Likely both men were whispering into Washington’s ears bipolar advice about the nation, national power, and the duties of president and the direction of our country’s government (even though Washington was a Federalist in many views).

Image Source: Wikimedia Commons

Hamilton vs. Jefferson

Like today, federal politics was very heated and passionate. During Washington’s presidency, Jefferson feared that Hamilton was going to move away from the republican structure of government under the Constitution and form a government based more closely on monarchy modeled after the English Constitution. Perhaps Jefferson’s fears were founded as the Federalist dominated national government during the 18th Century. Under Washington’s presidency, Hamilton and Jefferson battled constantly.

Hamilton, a renowned financier, was extremely powerful and wildly popular. Facing a wartime debt from the American Revolution, Hamilton attacked the debt, established the nation’s Federal bank system, the First Federal Bank of 1791, and created the U.S. Mint. Facing tremendous outside pressure, Hamilton resigned from his position in 1795. In the same light, Jefferson serving as first Secretary of State and using his experience as a foreign ambassador guided a young America against constant foreign affairs. Jefferson finally got so fed up with the constant barrage from Hamilton that he too resigned from his position in 1793.

The 12th Amendment

The same groups that formed during the ratification of the U.S. Constitution and had battled under Washington’s presidency formed again under the newly elected presidency of John Adams during the election of 1796. In fact, the split was so powerful that it necessitated the passing of the later 12th Amendment. The 12th Amendment was only ratified to change the Electoral College process by allowing both the president and vice-president to be on one political ticket. The framers of the Constitution in 1787 instead had focused on a nation run by the “best men,” but this was before the political factions had taken root. Not that it had not been in their minds – it had been a pretentious topic during the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.

This is why during the ratification of the U.S. Constitution the Federalist Papers were also adopted. Coined by some of our greatest minds – written anonymously by men like James Madison, Jefferson, and under pseudonyms like Brutus and a Farmer, these papers constituted a sort of ideological war and were the basis of the differences that led to the later two-party political system.

Why the 12th Amendment Was Created

During the election of 1796, the Electoral College cast votes for four different men. Adams won by a narrow margin of 71-68 electoral votes. Adams (a Federalist) became president with his vice-president being Jefferson (a Democratic-Republican). Despite their differences, both had a favorable political relationship in the past and were able to see past these differences to work together for the most part during Adams’ presidency.

Once again in the election of 1800, the last election before the passing of the12th Amendment, the Electoral College still cast one vote per man. Jefferson, who now ran on a political ticket with Aaron Burr (who later shot and killed Hamilton in a duel) were Democrat-Republicans both running for President. Also running was Adams, who ran with Charles Pinckney, were Federalists both running for president. Jefferson won this election by a vote of 73-65 over Adams. Jefferson became president, and Burr became his vice-president (despite a tie vote between Jefferson and Burr that had to be decided by the House of Representatives and a stepping down by Burr).

Had this amendment not been passed, then both Federalists and Democratic-Republicans would have went on and be elected president and vice-president. Can you imagine what it would be like today if two people of two very different political parties could be elected as president and vice-president? Chaos!

1804 Election Results, Democrat-Republicans in blue color

The Election of 1804

During Jefferson’s election as president in 1804, the two-political system took hold. Jefferson easily defeated the Federalist, Pinckney, after the passing of the 12th Amendment. Presidential and vice-presidential votes were cast together with Jefferson’s vice-president being George Clinton (who also served under Jefferson’s successor, James Madison) winning by a landslide. Jefferson’s 45 percent point margin of victory remains the highest margin of victory in a presidential election in which there were multiple major party candidates. Every election for president after the election of 1804 was based upon this election. After this election, the Federalist Party was essentially defeated and washed away into political afterthought.

The Importance Today

Today this interpretation of power is known as the “strict versus loose” interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. Does the U.S. Constitution give the federal government power that is only in writing or power that is implied? And just like then, it is still hotly debated today. Since the passing of the “necessary and proper” clause in Article I of the Constitution and the decision of the Supreme Court case McCulloch vs. Maryland in 1819, the federal government has slowly become more and more powerful. And to many historians today, we as a country are a far cry from our republican roots and founding.

Federalists Vs. Democratic Republicans Essay

Federalists vs. Democratic Republicans

George Washington himself wanted to avoid a party system in America. Unfortunately, even when saying this he was part of the beginning of one of the first parties in United States politics. There have been many different parties surface since the beginning of the American political system. They all have different thoughts, policies, and motivations. Each party has come and gone, some have made significant contributions and others have not. The first split, and beginning of the party system, came with the differentiation between the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans. These two parties were extremely different in thought, design, and status of people involved. This paper, will deal with what these differences were, and whom each party consisted of. I will start by explaining some about who the Federalists were, then I will describe the Democratic Republicans, and finally I will summarize some of the contrasts between the two.
The Federalists were a powerful and wealthy party. Mostly lawyers, big businessmen, bankers, merchants, and professionals made up the Federalist Party. The Federalists had a lot of money and were mostly influential in New England and the North part of the United States because big business was very popular there. The Federalist Party consisted of people who were very much Anglophiles. They loved Britain and all things British. The Federalists felt that there should be a loose constructionist interpretation of the constitution. They believed that there were things implied by or simply understood by the wording of the Constitution. According to the Federalists, just because something was not specifically written in the Constitution doesn't mean that it wasn't covered or addressed as something that the federal government could handle. The Federalist Party also supported a strong governmental leadership. They thought that the most important branch of government was the executive...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

Creating the Constitution Essay

2380 words - 10 pages The words spoken by man have the power to shape and ratify everything in its path. These following questions will do just that. Is not the strengthening of our federal government essential to the maintaining of a stable bureaucracy? Must we forego the strong fundamental structure that will ensure that every man will benefit immensely from a nation governed by those of the utmost intelligence and experience? We as a nation must procure a stance...

Democrat vs. Republican Essay

590 words - 2 pages Payton WilkenfeldU.S. History to 1877Post Exam Paper- 48/3/2014Democrat vs. RepublicanWhen looking at the Democrat and Republican Parties, both sides vary on numerous topics. Although one may claim themselves to belong to a specific party that does not mean that their beliefs do not drift from the ideas of the other party. As you will soon notice, the Republican Party...

Early government

1486 words - 6 pages      In early American government there were two emerging political views that were blatantly obvious in the new states; federalists and anti-federalists. In this paper two main topics of interest for each of the parties will be discussed, the role that government should have according to the differing views and the subject of foreign policy.      The role of government as a according to the...

Jeffersonians and the Federalists.

730 words - 3 pages Jeffersonians vs. FederalistsDuring the period of 1801-1817, the Jeffersonians and the Federalists were viewed differently when it came to the federal Constitution. The Jeffersonians were viewed as strict constructionists and the Federalists were more of a group of loose constructionists. Although the two parties had their different views on the federal government, they occasionally switched their views to help solve certain...

The development of political parties between 1790-1810: Why did the first parties arise? Who were their leaders? What impact did the parties have on America.

982 words - 4 pages George Washington himself thought it would be in America's best interest to avoid forming political parties. But even having said this Washington was already involved in the formation of one of the first political parties in America. In the beginning, before the Washington Administration, there were no parties; you were either for or against Congress and or independence. When the Constitutional Convention was called we see the first major...

Comparison between Jefferson and Hamilton

1194 words - 5 pages Simple suspicion and a clash of political ideology led to the first division within a united party. This party was originally united under one common cause- the freedom of a new and growing nation. However, as the nation began to spread its wings, conflicts arose and the two parties separated from one. This split was inevitable because of the contradicting ideologies each founding "brother" fought to uphold. Each had a different idea, each had...

Comparing Strict and Broad Constructionism

929 words - 4 pages Comparing Strict and Broad Constructionism It was 1800, when vice president Jefferson succeeded Adams in the role of president. Jefferson stressed republican virtues of independence and equality and his belief in a frugal government. With his inauguration, the transfer of power to the Republican from the Federalists intensified a political conflict between the two political parties. Even though Jefferson stated in his inaugural address...

Republican Attacks Against Alexander Hamilton

767 words - 3 pages Republican Attacks Against Alexander Hamilton Hamilton's Federalist Party and the Democratic Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson had polarized views on the majority of the important political issues. These two political parties which possessed differing opinions and views pertaining to the future of the U.S. government were persistent in their respective arguments against each other. The strongly contrasting views of these two parties are the...

The First American Party System

1510 words - 6 pages Section 8 Chapter 5: The First American Party System Today, political parties are an authoritative and essential component of the United States political system. However, it is important to examine how the political parties began and evolved over hundreds of years, since they were first established. In 1794, the major political parties were the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. The major difference between these two was that the...

Marbury vs Madison

921 words - 4 pages Marbury vs Madison As the government was newly establishing its stronghold on the nation, forging its way to a powerful republic and instituting precedents for the future, a struggle to preserve the foundations of American Society instituted by Washington and John Adams existed as Thomas Jefferson took office. In an attempt to maintain the “edifice of the National Government” believing Jefferson would topple the prestigious nation with his...

American Politics in the 1790s

912 words - 4 pages In the 1790s, American society was split in half. On one side there was Alexander Hamilton, who believed in a strong central government and that the future of America lied in manufacturing and strong businesses. Opposing him was Thomas Jefferson, who believed America's strength should come from its states. He foresaw a nation of small and independent farmers, where the government would not need to become directly involved in the daily affairs...


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *